Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards

About Omniverse111

  • Title
  1. The Ul Ti mate TITAN Showdown

    NVIDIA GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X Engine Specs: 3072CUDA Cores 1000Base Clock (MHz) 1075Boost Clock (MHz) 192Texture Fill Rate (GigaTexels/sec) GTX TITAN X Memory Specs: 7.0 GbpsMemory Clock 12 GBStandard Memory Config GDDR5Memory Interface 384-bitMemory Interface Width 336.5Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) GTX TITAN X Technology Support: Yes (4-way)NVIDIA SLI® Ready YesNVIDIA G-Sync™-Ready YesNVIDIA GameStream™-Ready YesGeForce ShadowPlay™ 2.0NVIDIA GPU Boost™ YesDynamic Super Resolution YesMFAA YesNVIDIA GameWorks™ 12 API with Feature Level 12.1Microsoft DirectX 4.5OpenGL YesCUDA PCI Express 3.0Bus Support Windows 8 & 8.1, Windows 7, Windows Vista, Linux, FreeBSD x86OS Certification Display Support: 5120x3200Maximum Digital Resolution* 2048x1536Maximum VGA Resolution Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Standard Display Connectors 4 displaysMulti Monitor YesHDCP InternalAudio Input for HDMI GTX TITAN X Graphics Card Dimensions: 4.376 inches height 10.5 inchesLength Dual-widthWidth Thermal and Power Specs: 91 C Maximum GPU Temperature (in C) 250 WGraphics Card Power (W) 600 WRecommended System Power (W)** 6-pin + 8-pinSupplementary Power Connectors NVIDIA TITAN Xp GPU Engine Specs: 3840NVIDIA CUDA® Cores 1582Boost Clock (MHz) Memory Specs: 11.4 Gbps Memory Speed 12 GB GDDR5XStandard Memory Config 384-bit Memory Interface Width 547.7 GB/s Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) Technology Support: Yes Simultaneous Multi-Projection Yes VR Ready YesNVIDIA Ansel Yes - SLI HB Bridge SupportedNVIDIA SLI® Ready YesNVIDIA G-SYNC™-Ready YesNVIDIA GameStream™-Ready 3.0NVIDIA GPU Boost™ 12 API with feature level 12_1Microsoft DirectX YesVulkan API 4.5OpenGL PCIe 3.0Bus Support Windows 7-101, Linux, FreeBSDx86OS Certification Display Support: [email protected] Digital Resolution2 DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0bStandard Display Connectors YesMulti Monitor 2.2HDCP Graphics Card Dimensions: 4.376"Height 10.5"Length 2-SlotWidth Thermal and Power Specs: 94Maximum GPU Temperature (in C) 250 WGraphics Card Power (W) 600 W Recommended System Power (W)4 NVIDIA TITAN V 6Graphics Processing Clusters 80Streaming Multiprocessors 5120CUDA Cores (single precision) 320Texture Units 1200 MHz base Clock (MHz) 1455 MHzBoost Clock (MHz) 850 MHzMemory Clock 1.7 Gbps memory Data Rate 4608KL2 Cache Size 12288 MB HBM2Total Video Memory 3072-bit memory Interface 652.8 GB/sTotal Memory Bandwidth 384 GigaTexels/sec texture Rate (Bilinear) 12 nm Fabrication Process 21.1 BillionTransistor Count 3 x DisplayPort, 1 x HDMI Connectors Windows 10 64-bit, Windows 7 64-bit, Linux, FreeBSDx86, SolarisOS Certification Dual SlotForm Factor One 6-pin, One 8-pin Power Connectors 600 WattsRecommended Power Supply 250 WattsThermal Design Power (TDP)1 91° CThermal Threshold2 One 8-pin and One 6-pin 6-pin + 8-pinSupplementary Power Connectors
  2. Is there going to be a AMD Gpu to truly rival the 1080ti?

    AMD RX Vega 64 when compared with GTX 1080Ti The Battle was One-Sided Features Key features of the Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Memory Bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory Radeon RX Vega 64 483.8 GB/s GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 484.4 GB/s Pixel Rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second Radeon RX Vega 64 98.94 GPixel/s GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 139.2 GPixel/s Texture Rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping Radeon RX Vega 64 395.8 GTexel/s GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 354.4 GTexel/s Floating Point Performance How fast the GPU can crunch numbers Radeon RX Vega 64 12,665 GFLOPS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11,340 GFLOPS Shading Units Subcomponents of the GPU, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading Radeon RX Vega 64 4,096 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 3,584 Texture Mapping Units Built into each GPU, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes Radeon RX Vega 64 256 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 224 Taken from GPU Boss.com As we can see that The Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti only outsmarts Vega in Memory Bandwith and Pixel Rate But AMD Takes the lead so we can conclude that AMD wins and we can expect that AMD can compete and come up with the New NON-BUDGET Friendly GPU's